BEFORE beginning any funding application, clubs should ensure they have identified a genuine need that aligns with their Club Plan and strategic priorities. The most successful applications are those that clearly demonstrate how the proposed project addresses an identified need within the club and wider community.
Clubs should avoid attempting to reshape projects simply to fit the criteria of a funding programme. Invariably, this results in wasted time, effort and resources, with applications often failing because they do not genuinely align with the funder’s objectives. Funding should support the club’s identified priorities, not determine them.
Prior to starting an application, clubs should ensure that all key governance, financial and project documentation is up to date and readily available. This may include:
- Signed and approved annual accounts.
- Minutes of the most recent AGM, including confirmation of the annual ratification of the Club Constitution.
- An up-to-date Club Constitution, signed and dated as required.
- Corporate Trustee documentation (where applicable).
- Recent bank statements.
- Planning Permission approval documentation (where required).
- Confirmation from Building Control (where required).
- Letters of support.
- Relevant insurance documentation.
- Child safeguarding and governance policies.
- Evidence of quotations, estimates, surveys or feasibility work where appropriate.
Many funding programmes have tight application windows and require extensive supporting documentation. Clubs that maintain accurate and up-to-date records throughout the year are far better positioned to respond quickly and submit high-quality applications.
Clubs should also pay particular attention to the eligibility criteria of each funding programme before investing significant time in preparing an application. It is important to carefully review who can apply, what types of projects are eligible, match funding requirements, project timescales, eligible expenditure and any restrictions or exclusions that may apply. A considerable amount of time and effort can be wasted preparing applications for schemes where the club, project or proposed expenditure does not meet the funder’s requirements.
Good preparation is often the difference between a successful and unsuccessful application. Ensuring governance, financial and legal documentation is current before a funding opportunity arises will save significant time and reduce stress during the application process.
Most importantly, clubs should ensure that any funding sought supports priorities already identified through their Club Plan. Funding should be used as a means of delivering the club’s strategic objectives, not as a reason to pursue projects that have not been identified as a priority need. Clubs that align funding applications to clearly evidenced needs and long-term plans are more likely to secure funding and achieve meaningful outcomes for their members and community.
Checking
Funders are increasingly reporting that applications generated primarily through Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools can often be easily recognised. While AI can be a useful tool for checking grammar, structure and clarity, clubs should ensure that applications remain authentic and reflect their own experiences, needs and aspirations. Applications written in the club’s own words are often more compelling as they convey genuine passion, local knowledge and a clear understanding of the project and its intended impact.
Similarly, funders are reporting an increase in applications being completed by paid consultants or professional grant writers on behalf of clubs and community organisations. While external support can be valuable in helping clubs understand funding requirements and develop project proposals, applications should still reflect the voice, priorities and circumstances of the club itself. Funders frequently identify generic responses, inconsistencies and errors that can arise when the same individual or organisation is preparing applications for multiple groups simultaneously.
The strongest applications are those that clearly demonstrate local ownership of the project, evidence of consultation with members and the community, and a genuine understanding of why the investment is needed. Clubs should not underestimate the value of telling their own story. Authentic, well-evidenced applications that reflect the club’s unique circumstances are often more persuasive than highly polished submissions that lack a clear connection to the people and communities they are intended to benefit.
Ultimately, funders invest in people, communities and outcomes, not simply projects. Clubs that can clearly articulate their need, demonstrate strong governance and present a genuine, evidence-based case for support will always be in the strongest position when seeking external funding.
Receive quality journalism wherever you are, on any device. Keep up to date from the comfort of your own home with a digital subscription.
Any time | Any place | Anywhere








